1792 plan of Washington, D.C. engraved in Boston by Samuel Hill

[After Andrew Ellicott] / S[amuel] Hill (engraver), PLAN of the City of WASHINGTON. [Boston: Ebenezer Andrews, May] 1792.
Engraving, printed area 8”h x 9 ¾”w plus generous margins, uncolored.
Sold

The rare second printed map of Washington, D.C. being the small-scale edition of the “Ellicott Plan” engraved by Samuel Hill for the Massachusetts Magazine.

Due to the vicissitudes of war and sectional politics, the site of the American capital remained unsettled for years after independence. Indeed, prior to 1790 Congress met variously at Philadelphia, Lancaster and York, Pennsylvania; Annapolis and Baltimore, Maryland; Princeton and Trenton, New Jersey; and New York City. The location of the permanent capital was not confirmed until the Residence Act of 1790, which provided for a district not more than 10 miles square along the Potomac River “at some place between the mouths of the Eastern Branch and the Connogocheague.” Passage of the Act was made possible by the so-called “Compromise of 1790,” in which southern states agreed to back Hamilton’s plan for federal assumption of state debts in return for the latter’s support for locating the capital along the Potomac.

In January 1791 President Washington announced that the capital district would be a diamond-shaped tract, 10 miles per side, roughly centered on the confluence of the Potomac and Eastern Branch (Anacostia) Rivers. Andrew Ellicott was engaged to conduct a topographical survey of the area, while Pierre L’Enfant was hired to develop a plan for the capital city itself. L’Enfant was a French artist and engineer who had served as a volunteer during the Revolution and was sufficiently well connected that he had been asked to design the seal for the Society of the Cincinnati. He was brilliant but difficult, so much so that Washington eventually fired him in 1792 and engaged Ellicott, who used L’Enfant’s design as the basis for his plan of the city.

L’Enfant had envisioned a grand capital on the European model, with broad avenues, large public squares and dramatic sightlines, all designed to make the most of the site’s topography and its splendid riverside setting. The intent was to convey the grandeur and permanence of the national government—which at the time was all of three years old, boasted a bureaucracy of perhaps 200 employees, and rested on a Constitution that was feared as much as it was venerated. This vision was of course realized, but few would have predicted it at the time. In 1792 the site was a humid swamp and would remain so for years, and its grand buildings rose in the midst of a veritable sea of mud.

Copies of Ellicott’s manuscript plan were forwarded to the firms of Thackara & Vallance in Philadelphia and Samuel Hill Jr. in Boston. They were to engrave and publish it as quickly as possible, in order that it might be distributed to facilitate the sale of land in the new city. Before publishing the large-scale “official” plans, each firm rushed smaller versions into print. That by Thackara & Vallance appeared first, in The Universal Asylum And Columbian Magazine for March 1792. Offered here is the much rarer version by Samuel Hill, which was included as a plate in the May 1792 Massachusetts Magazine. The proofs of the official plans were not ready until June or July 1792, making the Thackara & Vallance and Hill editions respectively the first and second published plans of Washington, D.C.

References
Jolly, Maps of America in Periodicals before 1800, #437. Stephenson, “From L’Enfant to the Senate Park Commission: Mapping the Nation’s Capital from 1791 to 1902,” p. 6 and fig. 7 (in Philip Lee Phillips Map Society, The Occasional Papers, series no. 6 (Winter 2014)). Wheat and Brun, Checklist of Maps Printed in America before 1800, #528. Some background from Miller, Washington in Maps: 1606-2000, pp. 44-47.

Condition

Folds flattened, upper-right margin expertly reinstated with period laid paper, repairs and reinforcements to verso. Minor soiling, repairs and restorations in margins not affecting printed area.